This is “cool. It changed something.. but like.. how much did it move the needle?”
We can compute this two ways:
- Cohen’s d (how much does this move the needle?)
- proportion of variance accounted for (does it have a consistent effect?)
Cohen’s D
This measures the size of the changes in the scores.
Independent tests use
Related tests use
Cohen proposed these guidelines:
| d | effect |
|---|---|
| .2 | small |
| .5 | medium |
| .8 | large |
Proportion of variance accounted for
This measures how consistently the scores change.
Given this data from a related-sample study:
| Before therapy | After |
|---|---|
| 10 | 5 |
| 11 | 6 |
| 12 | 7 |
We can see that there is some variance b/c of the independent variable (people b/c 10 != 11).
We describe this via “square point-biserial correlation coefficient”
if ,
Guidelines for interpreting:
| Range | Interpretation |
|---|---|
| < .09 | Small effect |
| .10 - .25 | Moderate / relatively common |
| > .25 | Large / rare |
ANOVA
When calculating effect size for ANOVA, we’re looking for eta squared .