This is “cool. It changed something.. but like.. how much did it move the needle?”

We can compute this two ways:

  • Cohen’s d (how much does this move the needle?)
  • proportion of variance accounted for (does it have a consistent effect?)

Cohen’s D

This measures the size of the changes in the scores.

Independent tests use

Related tests use

Cohen proposed these guidelines:

deffect
.2small
.5medium
.8large

Proportion of variance accounted for

This measures how consistently the scores change.

Given this data from a related-sample study:

Before therapyAfter
105
116
127

We can see that there is some variance b/c of the independent variable (people b/c 10 != 11).

We describe this via “square point-biserial correlation coefficient”

if ,

Guidelines for interpreting:

RangeInterpretation
< .09Small effect
.10 - .25Moderate / relatively common
> .25Large / rare

ANOVA

When calculating effect size for ANOVA, we’re looking for eta squared .